Moonlightaholics

coco wrote:Oooh, pretty new banner MSJ.

I'm going to just keep agreeing with coco
That B & W is a thing of beauty.

Fleur de Lisa wrote:

coco wrote:Oooh, pretty new banner MSJ.

I'm going to just keep agreeing with coco
That B & W is a thing of beauty.

agree with both of you....hearkens back to the noir version of Mick....beautiful

Any of you recall "Flat Stanley"?? The little cardboard cut-out dude that your kids took to various places and took pix of, then submitted the photos to the class to show al the places Flat Stanley had been?

Well, this is my version, of which I am travelling all over this board with:
[



I call it Hot Stanley.

Never heard of 'Flat Stanley' Fleur, but liking the Hot Stanley a whole lot more - this is me running after the tractor

Oh yeah, I'd like to take Hot Stanley to various places! Or I'd at least be happy to die trying.

Yeah...

This may be the ONLY time the words "Hot" and "Stanley" are used together, ever. Thank you, dear Alex!

And I think this pic needs to put in an appearance here too:



Red

Yeah, these pics are still looking as lovely as they did at 4am.

Loving the black henley one more and more.

They are both lovely ladies... thank you for bringing them here...

But don't ya'll think that the henley picture begs a comparison shot?

I mean, Mick and his dark henleys... vs. Stan and his dark henley... I know it's not the Mick thread, but just for comparison's sake... ya know??

I know there are better pics of these but I have these to hand:

Sigh, I love the hair. Just love the hair. And what he does in a black henley.

Yeah, Coco... I know how sub par those particular Mick-henley shots are... But we'll just have to go with them....

Woot!

And he does look different as Stan, doesn't he? With the different hair and the scruff and he looks thinner... yet still so lovely...
Thanks, Coco!!!!

wpgrace wrote:Yeah, Coco... I know how sub par those particular Mick-henley shots are... But we'll just have to go with them....

Woot!

And he does look different as Stan, doesn't he? With the different hair and the scruff and he looks thinner... yet still so lovely...
Thanks, Coco!!!!

There never really is a sub par photo is there?

Stan is by far the best Alex has ever looked in a role outside of ML IMO. I never thought I'd see past Hiatt but Stan ticks all my boxes.

coco wrote:

wpgrace wrote:Yeah, Coco... I know how sub par those particular Mick-henley shots are... But we'll just have to go with them....

Woot!

And he does look different as Stan, doesn't he? With the different hair and the scruff and he looks thinner... yet still so lovely...
Thanks, Coco!!!!

There never really is a sub par photo is there?

Stan is by far the best Alex has ever looked in a role outside of ML IMO. I never thought I'd see past Hiatt but Stan ticks all my boxes.

Oh... Hiatt ... still love Kevin, gotta say. But Stan does... er... tick boxes... not familiar with that expression coco... but I get it!

Yeah, he ticks my boxes, pushes my buttons, and just generally rings my chimes. I like Stan.

Here's another Henley shot. For professional purposes only, of course...