Moonlightaholics

I've never had so much fun scrolling IN MY LIFE.

scrolling is good.

Alex is better.

Love scrolling Alex.

Am making no sense at the moment......

Fleur de Lisa wrote:scrolling is good.

Alex is better.

Love scrolling Alex.

Am making no sense at the moment......

Scrolling Alex? Is that a euphemism for something??? Cuz, if it is, I'm there.

Darlingcat - I am a little confused. (Nothing new there). The pictures you posted a few hours ago - are they from the April TV Guide article or are they from somewhere else? Just wondering. I now subscribe to TV Guide although I didn't in April but I have the April issue, and I don't remember all those hot photos. Thanks.

They really didn't pick the best pictures to publish. Maybe they were just too Hot for TVGuide.

Moonlightsonata wrote:Darlingcat - I am a little confused. (Nothing new there). The pictures you posted a few hours ago - are they from the April TV Guide article or are they from somewhere else? Just wondering. I now subscribe to TV Guide although I didn't in April but I have the April issue, and I don't remember all those hot photos. Thanks.

MS, they are from the same shoot but were never published.

Red

Thanks Red. I didn't think I had seen them all before.

Smokin'

Jade wrote:They really didn't pick the best pictures to publish. Maybe they were just too Hot for TVGuide.

ITA Jade. These pics are SO much better than the ones they published. HOT, HOT, HOT.

Thanks for these very revealing photos. I find most of them really trashy. I think my biggest objection is that Alex is so objectified in them, no Alex personality coming through. Any model would do. All they needed was the body.

I understand these were discards? With good reason, IMO.

Wow!!! Like some better than others, but even so, wow!

Amazing how different clothes, changing the hair around a bit changes the personality that comes through.....had you not said that they were all from the same shoot, I wouldn't have guessed that.....

lafluffy wrote:Thanks for these very revealing photos. I find most of them really trashy. I think my biggest objection is that Alex is so objectified in them, no Alex personality coming through. Any model would do. All they needed was the body.

I understand these were discards? With good reason, IMO.

lafluffy, I absolutely understand what you mean. But remember the name of the issue they were shootiing for...the photographer did an awfully good job of capturing the "sexy" part, I think. Alex has done modeling-type photoshoots before, and I agree that those show more of the outside and less of the inside of him--which is the most beautiful part. But for sheer decorative quality, I think these photos did their job very well.

lafluffy wrote:Thanks for these very revealing photos. I find most of them really trashy. I think my biggest objection is that Alex is so objectified in them, no Alex personality coming through. Any model would do. All they needed was the body.

I understand these were discards? With good reason, IMO.

Couldn't disagree with you more. His varied personalities come through in each of these different shots. His looks, as well as his versatile acting ability, make him a chameleon. His talent shines through his eyes, and his expressions, whether he is on a magazine page, or tv/movie screen.

Fleur de Lisa wrote:

lafluffy wrote:Thanks for these very revealing photos. I find most of them really trashy. I think my biggest objection is that Alex is so objectified in them, no Alex personality coming through. Any model would do. All they needed was the body.

I understand these were discards? With good reason, IMO.

Couldn't disagree with you more. His varied personalities come through in each of these different shots. His looks, as well as his versatile acting ability, make him a chameleon. His talent shines through his eyes, and his expressions, whether he is on a magazine page, or tv/movie screen.

Gotta agree with Fleur (no surprises there ), I adore these photo's.

How's the desktop dilemma coming, coco? Reached a decision yet?

Red