All About Mick, #33

[allegrita]

Sigh... looks like it.

[r1015bill]

#19, page 14-15

[allegrita]

I had to rescue that first one...

[r1015bill]

#19, page 15

[allegrita]

I love the one of Mick with the bottle of saline! It's not a "usual" shot.

[kath40]

I love the one of Mick with the bottle of saline! It's not a "usual" shot.

I agree Alle. Here it is without the PB watermark. you're welcome.

[allegrita]

Oh, thank you so much, Kath!

[r1015bill]

Because of the big PB watermark, I'm wondering whether I need to modify how I do this. I'd like to get your thoughts.

Basically once a week, I post the next three pictures from the thread where I last posted. Should I

1) keep doing that no matter where the watermark is trusting that the viewer will remember the original in their minds
2) skip the really obnoxiously ruined photos (see the first one below; it's such a shame)
3) skip any PB watermarks and only show unmarked photos.

What do you think?

#19, page 15

[allegrita]

Okay, this is weird. I'm not seeing the PB watermarks today.

I think you should still post the obnoxiously watermarked pictures. If they are really special, we can always "save" them by downloading the pictures from PB and then re-uploading them to imgbox or somewhere. The watermarks aren't on the downloaded images.

[r1015bill]

#19, page 15

[allegrita]

Those all needed saving.

[allegrita]

And while I'm at it, though I don't have the small size of that lovely picture of Mick from the end of B.C., this is approximately the same screen shot, in HD.

[r1015bill]

Thanks, alle! That last one was the one that got me thinking about whether I should keep posting.

[MoonMarg]

Definitely keep posting!!

[jmc]

Definitely keep posting!!

What she said!