Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post Reply
User avatar
wpgrace
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 16429
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:25 pm

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by wpgrace »

Well, honey, since they are advertising "series finale" I hope they actually made some effort to provide the finale part... meaning that they wrapped up the story arcs in SOME fashion. Not counting on it, given what the writing crew and show runner here have delivered so far. But hoping Kuol gets his heart, Andy has some path for his life, and that we aren't left with any annoying unresolved issues with the other doctors.

Not holding my breath on any of that... but hoping.
Image
Banner by redwinter101. I miss you, Beloved.
Awesome avatar by the awesome, clever, and gracious Lilly.

If you read a lot of books you are considered well read. But if you watch a lot of TV, you're not considered well viewed. Lilly Tomlin

Grateful to Alex for Mick, Andy, and McG. :)
User avatar
redwinter101
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 23759
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 am
Location: lost in Moonlight, forever

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by redwinter101 »

jen wrote:I realize that this will get several pieces of virtual rotten fruit and vegetables thrown in my direction, but I will admit that while I watched TR for Alex, I never understood how or why they could get so many things so wrong and miss so many opportunities.
jen, we have 11 threads about Three Rivers saying pretty much the same thing. No-one's thrown anything yet.

I enjoyed the episode - the pacing was good and ITA the donor storyline wasn't missed at all. They gave us enough time to be interested in the patients and care about what happened to them. Loved the Luc/Andy stuff and the interaction among the doctors.

I'm off to hunt for next week's promo...

Red
Image

Click here for my story index

"Unable are the loved to die, for love is immortality" - Emily Dickinson
User avatar
redwinter101
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 23759
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 am
Location: lost in Moonlight, forever

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by redwinter101 »

Image

Click here for my story index

"Unable are the loved to die, for love is immortality" - Emily Dickinson
User avatar
wpgrace
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 16429
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:25 pm

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by wpgrace »

:hankie: :hankie: :hankie:
We need to hold a wake...
Image
Banner by redwinter101. I miss you, Beloved.
Awesome avatar by the awesome, clever, and gracious Lilly.

If you read a lot of books you are considered well read. But if you watch a lot of TV, you're not considered well viewed. Lilly Tomlin

Grateful to Alex for Mick, Andy, and McG. :)
User avatar
librarian_7
Forever Moonlightaholic
Posts: 23481
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: wherever Josef is
Contact:

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by librarian_7 »

I have to admit, I particularly liked that snarky line at the end...Dr. Andy is not always just sweetness and light.

Lucky
User avatar
allegrita
Moonlightaholic Admin
Posts: 46395
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:22 am
Location: Snuggled under the brown afghan, watching the fire

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by allegrita »

Siiiigh. :hankie: I think we should have a TR-watching party next week... and yeah, I liked that line too, Lucky.
Image
User avatar
redwinter101
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 23759
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 am
Location: lost in Moonlight, forever

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by redwinter101 »

Not that it matters a jot now, but last night's numbers were better:

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/06/27/tv ... ight/55430

Image

Red
Image

Click here for my story index

"Unable are the loved to die, for love is immortality" - Emily Dickinson
User avatar
aolver
Rogue vampire
Posts: 1055
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:33 am

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by aolver »

:heart: I loved the final scene between Luc and Andy, and the "long enough to meet me" line. I liked this episode. I even liked the story with Dr. Lee speaking Korean. And Luc would have been a great character in past episodes. :happysigh:
Image
Beautiful banner and avatar by Skylar
User avatar
r1015bill
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:15 pm

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by r1015bill »

I was going to climb up on my soap box and say "Too many characters" again.

But I find that I'm fully detached from TR now. It is just a BAD show, period. It deserved to be cancelled for a whole host of reasons which we have already discussed. The most important is, of course, "too many characters".

The only thing I want to know now is whether Kuol survives. Then I am entirely ready to never see Dr. Andy again.
User avatar
wpgrace
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 16429
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:25 pm

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by wpgrace »

:giggle: You really MUST stop holding back, rbill... tell us what you really think. :biggrin:

I think you are mostly right... there were a lot of characters. A show could make do with so many regulars, tho, IF they focussed upon those regulars each week... tho likely taking turns regarding which were the featured movers and shakers in that week's story. The problem with 3R is that it DID have so many characters (some of whom might have been really interesting, had we gotten to know them... ), but also had so many guest stars, so many complications in their medical stories, and so many side stories beyond the main one... all in each and every episode. And they insisted on giving us some back story to the guest stars... like we cared. And the med stories were not told in order to develop the characters... the med stories were told in order to tell a medical story. So they were not usually very interesting unless you're into that kind of thing, in which case some of the poetic license they took probably drove you crazy.

But you're right, honey. If they were gonna do all that, then they needed fewer doctors and nurses and organ transplant coordinators. :shrug:

I WILL miss Andy tho. He was one of those characters who, had they ever bothered to really develop him and reveal his back story, might have been quite entertaining to watch. And not just because he was pretty. :sigh:
Image
Banner by redwinter101. I miss you, Beloved.
Awesome avatar by the awesome, clever, and gracious Lilly.

If you read a lot of books you are considered well read. But if you watch a lot of TV, you're not considered well viewed. Lilly Tomlin

Grateful to Alex for Mick, Andy, and McG. :)
User avatar
Lilly
Moonlightaholic Mod
Posts: 25472
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:24 pm

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by Lilly »

Image

But most especially, this:
wpgrace wrote: I WILL miss Andy tho. He was one of those characters who, had they ever bothered to really develop him and reveal his back story, might have been quite entertaining to watch. And not just because he was pretty. :sigh:
Lilly

My Fanfic Index
Avatar from "Matasaburo of the Wind" © 2009 Alex Gross, used with the permission of the artist
User avatar
darkstarrising
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 11014
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:25 am

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by darkstarrising »

While noble in its intent, 3R was done in by basic math.

The show's approach was to present stories about organ donation from the three points of view; that of the doctors, the donors and the recipients. So, right off the rip, we have three 'subplots' in any given episode. So far, ok.

We have five doctors (Andy, Miranda, David, Sophia and to a lesser extent Lisa), one nurse (Pam) and one really annoying whatever he was (Ryan). So with three subplots, and seven recurring characters, it would be a stretch to throw all of the medical staff on one donor / recipient story per week. (they'd be tripping over each other, literally).

Solution? Have two or three donor / recipient stories per episode, thereby spreading out the medical staff, making it seem more realistic.

Problem? With three stories, each with three POVs, leads to nine separate 'segments' in any given episode. Each episode lasts approximately 40 minutes. On average, that's roughly 4.5 minutes for any given segment in an episode and that's just not enough time for in depth character development.

Hindsight is great, and that's all I can speak from. Having seen the show, it would have been better to reduce the subplots to no more than two for any given episode, periodically having only one subplot. The donor's stories are important, don't get me wrong, but in-depth coverage of the donor didn't need to occur in every episode. Last night's episode worked well without it.

*dsr now gets off her soapbox and thinks about getting some sleep*
darkstarrising
Love – the universal language, the story of Moonlight
View My Fanfic Index

Image

Thanks to the talented and generous Phoenix for my beautiful banner!
User avatar
r1015bill
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:15 pm

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by r1015bill »

grace - I guess when I detach, I DETACH! :snicker:
wpgrace wrote: He was one of those characters who, had they ever bothered to really develop him and reveal his back story, might have been quite entertaining to watch. And not just because he was pretty. :sigh:
I do agree with you, Grace. Andy could have been very entertaining, interesting, or heartwarming. But for whatever reason, he fell flat. We never got what made him tick so I find it hard to care that we won't see him again.

But you are right, Andy is pretty. I love the little clip of Andy dancing and hopefully we'll get a little clip of the eye roll from some of our video experts. I also love still shots.
darkstarrising wrote:While noble in its intent, 3R was done in by basic math.
dsr - Excellent analysis! Let me adjust your soapbox for you! :juggle:
User avatar
wpgrace
100% Moonlightaholic
Posts: 16429
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:25 pm

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by wpgrace »

Oh God... you two are awesome!!! :rolling:
Done in by the math! Moonlight Math was fishy, but intriguing and alluring somehow, and it still worked....

3R Math was just... ew... math... :roll: (more Alex eye-roll smiley... Y'all know I'm now obsessed by that, right? :devil: )
Image
Banner by redwinter101. I miss you, Beloved.
Awesome avatar by the awesome, clever, and gracious Lilly.

If you read a lot of books you are considered well read. But if you watch a lot of TV, you're not considered well viewed. Lilly Tomlin

Grateful to Alex for Mick, Andy, and McG. :)
User avatar
Lucy
Ancient
Posts: 4823
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:07 pm
Location: polishing Mick's Mercedes hood ornament

Re: Three Rivers - news, links, discussion - part 11 *SPOILERS*

Post by Lucy »

darkstarrising wrote:While noble in its intent, 3R was done in by basic math.

The show's approach was to present stories about organ donation from the three points of view; that of the doctors, the donors and the recipients. So, right off the rip, we have three 'subplots' in any given episode. So far, ok.

We have five doctors (Andy, Miranda, David, Sophia and to a lesser extent Lisa), one nurse (Pam) and one really annoying whatever he was (Ryan). So with three subplots, and seven recurring characters, it would be a stretch to throw all of the medical staff on one donor / recipient story per week. (they'd be tripping over each other, literally).

Solution? Have two or three donor / recipient stories per episode, thereby spreading out the medical staff, making it seem more realistic.

Problem? With three stories, each with three POVs, leads to nine separate 'segments' in any given episode. Each episode lasts approximately 40 minutes. On average, that's roughly 4.5 minutes for any given segment in an episode and that's just not enough time for in depth character development.

Hindsight is great, and that's all I can speak from. Having seen the show, it would have been better to reduce the subplots to no more than two for any given episode, periodically having only one subplot. The donor's stories are important, don't get me wrong, but in-depth coverage of the donor didn't need to occur in every episode. Last night's episode worked well without it.

*dsr now gets off her soapbox and thinks about getting some sleep*

BINGO, give the good woman an all expense paid trip the Pittsburgh, they have great chocolate covered pretzels.
Post Reply

Return to “Past Projects”