Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:19 pm
Page 26 of 31
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:37 pm
Happy as I am that his number is up substantially, I'm even happier that it's because of GOOD news...I'm sure we all share that feeling.
Good for you, Alex! Keep on keeping on!
Good for you, Alex! Keep on keeping on!
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:27 pm
He's down a bit this week...
2012 Apr 22 -- 524
It's a 48-point drop; however, there were no articles cited this week and there was no new H50 episode, so that's not really surprising.
2012 Apr 22 -- 524
It's a 48-point drop; however, there were no articles cited this week and there was no new H50 episode, so that's not really surprising.
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:06 pm
It feels normal. Normal is good. 
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:33 pm
He's down 48 this week...
2012 Apr 29 -- 572
Looking for a bump after he returns to H50 next week.
2012 Apr 29 -- 572
Looking for a bump after he returns to H50 next week.
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:03 pm
Normallish.
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 12:14 pm
Well, there are good weeks and there are bad weeks....
THIS is a very good week.
2012 May 6 -- 243
Alex is up almost 58%! That's 329 points!
THIS is a very good week.
2012 May 6 -- 243
Alex is up almost 58%! That's 329 points!
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 1:58 pm
Holy S&@@!!!!!
Is this the best number he's ever had (aside from the number he received after word of his personal/health issues became public)?
Is this the best number he's ever had (aside from the number he received after word of his personal/health issues became public)?
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 2:39 pm
His best score ever was 23 -- and it actually happened twice!
First, the week of April 25, 2010 when Backup Plan premiered, and then again, September 26, 2010 when H50 premiered.
Incidentally, his best number during the Moonlight run was 235, the week after B.C. showed.
And, finally, the lowest he's been since ML ended is 2066 during the week of January 4, 2009.
First, the week of April 25, 2010 when Backup Plan premiered, and then again, September 26, 2010 when H50 premiered.
Incidentally, his best number during the Moonlight run was 235, the week after B.C. showed.
And, finally, the lowest he's been since ML ended is 2066 during the week of January 4, 2009.
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 2:47 pm
Oh YAY!!! 
And thanks for the really interesting stats, Lilly!
Did they mention anything specific regarding why the number changed so much this week?
And thanks for the really interesting stats, Lilly!
Did they mention anything specific regarding why the number changed so much this week?Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 3:22 pm
The only thing cited this week was an article about H50 ratings. Actually, his name was only mentioned in passing, but it's a cool summary so I'm gpoing to post in the H50 general thread. 
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 3:59 pm
Thanks Lilly--you are an amazing Alex statistician!!
Where was I when he hit those 23's?? Must have been too excited about BUP and H5-0 to notice.
Y'all probably don't know this about me, but sometimes I get distracted in matters of Alex.
Where was I when he hit those 23's?? Must have been too excited about BUP and H5-0 to notice.
Y'all probably don't know this about me, but sometimes I get distracted in matters of Alex.
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 4:04 pm
Nooooo! Really??? 
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 6:28 pm
I never would have guessed, Fleur.
Re: Alex's IMDb STARmeter
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 1:45 pm
I'm at a loss to explain this...
2012 May 13 -- 400
Down 157 points in spite of seven news items cited.
It's not that 400 is a bad score by any stretch of the imagination. I'm thinking that last week's score may have been the anomaly.
2012 May 13 -- 400
Down 157 points in spite of seven news items cited.
It's not that 400 is a bad score by any stretch of the imagination. I'm thinking that last week's score may have been the anomaly.