Moonlightaholics

In a gay magazine.

"Um, excuse me . . ."

http://mercadotv.com.au/2009/08/before- ... amous.html

Gay men, straight women all think the same thing, "OMG! will you look at him!"

seamus3333 wrote:Gay men, straight women all think the same thing, "OMG! will you look at him!"

Exactly.

Hey, gay men are very discriminating. Of course they like our Alex.

sbj, where the heck did you FIND that?

GuardianAngel wrote:Hey, gay men are very discriminating. Of course they like our Alex.

sbj, where the heck did you FIND that?

http://mercadotv.com.au/2009/08/before- ... amous.html

Where did I find the article? Google Alert Alex. Yes, I'm, well, interested.

Good on ya, sbj!

STILL looks cute... and d@mn happy, I gotta say.

I'm usually pretty cheerful surrounded by liquor too...

Hey, bartender!!

Great find, sbj. Wow! He must have always hated his hair. I'm so glad we have all those lovely Mick pics with those beautiful curls.


Edited: I just skipped to an Alex google alert and noticed this quote:
http://flixchatter.wordpress.com/
Alex looks a heck of a lot better here without Mick’s ridiculously perfect mane only Zoolander could match. He seems more natural and at ease with his character Andy, sans the obligatory angst-y pout and stop-you-dead-in-your-track-with-my-sexy-glare pose. Well, an 85 year-old hopeless romantic vampire might be able to get away with it, but a surgeon? Not so much. So, bring on the scruff Alex, and easy on the hair gel!

I still love the curls!

Yeah, me too. He is so lucious with longer hair and can't get used to the short hair.

aolver wrote: Yeah, me too. He is so lucious with longer hair and can't get used to the short hair.

The Zoolander comparison made me cringe a bit though.

Mick had quite a few posing moments but he could pull it off. He was no Zoolander, that's for sure.

Mick? Zoolander?! Uh-uh. No way. Nope.

Mick St. John unveils his new "look":
Lucky

Mick was never Zoolander!!!!